|
|
|
Needlestick
Safety
and
Prevention Act
|
| |
|
HR 5178 & S 3067 –
|
Passed House of Representatives October 3,
Senate October 26, 2000 |
| Signed into Law November, 2000 |
|
Passed House of Representatives October 3, Senate October 26,
2000
Summary and Analysis of New Requirements
Material New Requirements of the Act:
- In addition to the existing requirements concerning exposure
control plans (29 CFR 1910.1030(c)(1)(iv)), the review and update
of such plans shall be required to also--
(A) `reflect changes in technology that eliminate or reduce
exposure to bloodborne pathogens'; and
(B) `document annually consideration and implementation of
appropriate commercially available and effective safer medical
devices designed to eliminate or minimize occupational exposure'.
- …employer shall establish and maintain a sharps injury log for
the recording of percutaneous injuries from contaminated sharps.
The information in the sharps injury log shall be recorded and
maintained in such manner as to protect the confidentiality of
the injured employee. The sharps injury log shall contain, at
a minimum--
(A) the type and brand of device involved in the incident,
(B) the department or work area where the exposure incident occurred,
and
(C) an explanation of how the incident occurred.’
- An employer, who is required to establish an Exposure Control
Plan shall solicit input from non-managerial employees responsible
for direct patient care who are potentially exposed to injuries
from contaminated sharps in the identification, evaluation, and
selection of effective engineering and work practice controls
and shall document the solicitation in the Exposure Control Plan.
Joint Statement of Intent of the House Sponsors (from Congressional
Record, emphasis added)
- While sharps with engineered sharps injury protections and needleless
systems are examples of safer medical devices, it is not the
intent of this legislation to limit engineering controls or, for
that matter, safer medical devices, to the examples cited in this
legislation. Nor should the citing of these examples be considered
an endorsement or preference of a specific product or assurance
of a specific product's effectiveness.
- Rather, it is the intent of this legislation to reflect innovation
and evolving technology in the marketplace. It is also
the intent of this legislation that any devices that have been
considered or determined to be engineering controls by OSHA shall
continue to be considered as such. This legislation anticipates
that hospitals and other employers, in crafting their Exposure
Control Plans, will adopt procedures and use devices that have
been proven to reduce the risk of needlestick injuries.
- It is through an employers' Exposure Control Plan that engineering
controls and safer devices are considered and deployed in
the workplace. To the extent that specific types of devices,
such as catheter securement devices or needle destruction
devices can reduce the risk of needlestick injuries, such devices
could be appropriate components of an employer's comprehensive
exposure control plan.
Joint Statement of Intent of the Senate Sponsors (from Congressional
Record, emphasis added)
- The citing of these examples should not be considered an
endorsement or preference of a specific product or assurance of
a specific product's effectiveness. Rather, it is the intent
of this legislation to reflect innovation and evolving technology
in the marketplace, in particular development in safer medical
devices such as SESIPS and needleless systems. This legislation
anticipates that hospitals and other employers, in crafting
their Exposure Control Plans, will adopt procedures and use
devices that have been proven to reduce the risk of needlestick
injuries.
- It is through an employer's Exposure Control Plan that engineering
controls, including safer medical devices, are considered and
deployed in the workplace. It is not the intent of this legislation
to disturb OSHA's existing determination that to the extent that
specific types of devices, such as catheter securement devices
or sharps destruction devices can reduce the risk of needlestick
injuries, such devices could be appropriate components of an employer's
comprehensive exposure control plan. OSHA expressed its understanding
of and agreement with this intent in a letter to Senator Jim Bunning,
dated October 13, 2000. The letter is submitted as an attachment
to this joint statement.
- From letter dated October 13, 2000, to Senator Jim Bunning
from Charles Jeffress, Assistant Secretary of Labor – "OSHA
has long required employers to protect employees from exposure
to bloodborne pathogens through the use of engineering controls,
which include sharps disposal devices such as sharps destruction
devices. To the extent that specific types of engineering controls
such as sharps destruction devices can reduce the risk of needlestick
injuries, such controls could be appropriate components of
an employer's comprehensive exposure control plan. OSHA has
allowed, and intends to continue to allow, employers to use sharps
destruction devices to help reduce the risk of needlestick injuries".

[ New
Law Brief | Summary |
State Laws | Recent
Activity | States Overview
| Our Position | Principles
]
[ Home | Site Map
| Contact Us | The
Company | Legislative & Regulatory
]
[ Health Care Industry | Products
| Services ]


©2000 Biomedical Disposal, Inc.
3690 Holcomb Bridge Road, Norcross, GA 30092
tel: 770-300-9595 toll free: 888-393-9595
info@biodisposal.com
| salesinfo@biodisposal.com
| webmaster@biodisposal.com
|